The Conflict of Care: Autonomy vs. ‘Unsafe’
Positive Risk Taking in Dementia Care sits at the heart of ethical, lawful, and person centred practice. Yet in dementia services, professionals often default to one word: unsafe.
During recent training sessions with social workers, nurses, carers, and assessors, participants repeatedly used “unsafe” as their starting point for decision making. While professionals must uphold safeguarding and duty of care, an overemphasis on eliminating risk can conflict with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA).
Parliament introduced the MCA to protect autonomy and empower individuals, not to remove all risk from their lives.
You can read the full legislation on the official UK site:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents
Guidance from the Social Care Institute for Excellence reinforces strengths-based, rights-focused practice:
https://www.scie.org.uk/mca/
The Legal Foundation for Positive Risk Taking in Dementia Care
The five statutory principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 clearly set out its intent:
- Presume capacity.
- Provide support for decision-making.
- Respect unwise decisions.
- Act in the best interests.
- Choose the least restrictive option.
Many professionals struggle most with the third principle: the right to make an unwise decision. Yet autonomy always carries risk. When practitioners prioritise safety above all else, they often restrict choice unnecessarily.
If “unsafe” becomes the default position, practice shifts from empowerment to protectionism. This shift gradually erodes dignity, independence, and identity.
Positive Risk Taking in Dementia Care challenges professionals to ask:
- Have we followed the first three principles of the MCA?
- Are we respecting the person’s wishes?
- Does the level of intervention match the actual level of risk?
- Have we maximised support before restricting this choice?
- Does this restriction represent the least restrictive option
Why Positive Risk Taking in Dementia Care Matters
Consider how you would feel if someone prevented you from:
- Walking to your local shop
- Cooking your favourite meal
- Visiting a lifelong friend
- Continuing a cherished hobby
For a person living with dementia or anyone, these activities express identity, purpose, and belonging.
When professionals remove these opportunities in the name of safety alone, they often remove meaning alongside risk.
Professionals fulfil their duty of care when they assess risk thoughtfully, document their reasoning clearly, and support proportionate decision making. They do not fulfil it by eliminating every element of uncertainty.
Positive Risk Taking in Dementia Care requires confidence, legal literacy, and reflective leadership. Teams that understand the Mental Capacity Act apply it with balance rather than fear. They replace defensive practice with defensible practice.
Positive Risk Taking in Dementia Care does not ignore safeguarding. It strengthens it by grounding decisions in law, proportionality, and respect for human rights.
Develop Confident, Lawful Dementia Leadership
If this tension between autonomy and safety resonates with you or your team, explore our professional development programmes:
- Understanding Dementia for Confident Care
- Empowering Choice with Confidence and the Law
- Empowered Dementia Care: The Confident Manager Intensive
Dates arranged to suit your organisation
£997 per individual
£4,500 per internal team (5–7 staff)
Because Positive Risk Taking in Dementia Care is not about eliminating risk, it is about leading with clarity, confidence, and lawful understanding.

Leave a Reply